Comparative analysis between ultrasonic shears versus ...

29 Jul.,2024

 

Comparative analysis between ultrasonic shears versus ...

There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, sex, body mass index (BMI), tumor location, preoperative cytology, or surgical extent. The time for lobectomy was significantly shorter in the advanced bipolar group (33.8±6.4 vs. 41.9±9.0 minutes, P=0.002). The number of camera cleanings was significantly lower in the advanced bipolar group (2.9±1.6 vs. 5.8±2.5 times, P<0.001). Estimated blood loss was also significantly less in the advanced bipolar group (11.5±17.3 vs. 81.8±99.5 mL, P=0.004). Postoperative hospital stays, drainage, pain score, laboratory findings, and complications were not significantly different between the two groups.

Ezisurg are exported all over the world and different industries with quality first. Our belief is to provide our customers with more and better high value-added products. Let's create a better future together.

This study was designed as an open-label, prospective randomized controlled trial in a single university hospital. Patients were randomly assigned to the ultrasonic group or advanced bipolar group before the surgery. From June to May , 40 patients were enrolled (20 patients were assigned to the ultrasonic group, and 20 patients were assigned to the advanced bipolar group). Primary endpoints were operation time for lobectomy, number of camera cleanings, and blood loss during the lobectomy. Secondary endpoints were pain score, postoperative drainage, and blood chemistry. A single endocrine surgeon had performed all surgeries.

The transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) is the most recently developed minimally invasive technique with no skin incision. For tissue dissection and bleeding control, the use of proper energy devices is very important in endoscopic thyroid surgery. To date, there have been no clinical studies reported regarding which energy device is better in TOETVA, ultrasonic shears or advanced bipolar device. The aim of our study is to determine which energy device is more useful for TOETVA.

The thyroid gland has a rich vascular supply, and both arterial and venous flow come from carotid and subclavian arteries and subclavian or internal jugular veins. Therefore, special caution should be taken to prevent bleeding during thyroid surgery. In endoscopic thyroid surgery, the use of energy devices is very important for tissue dissection and bleeding control without manual ligation by tie or clips. Currently, there are two types of energy devices being used widely in thyroid surgery: ultrasound-based device and advanced bipolar device. In conventional open thyroid surgery, many clinical studies have been reported on the effectiveness and safety of two devices. Therefore, there is sufficient clinical evidence that both devices can be safely applied in open thyroid surgery ( 18 , 19 ). However, no clinical study has yet addressed which energy device is more efficient regarding operation time and safer in TOETVA.

After the first report of endoscopic parathyroidectomy by Gagner in and video-assisted thyroid lobectomy by Hüscher et al. in , many remote access endoscopic thyroid surgeries have been attempted, concurrent with the development of laparoscopic surgery devices during the past decade ( 6 - 12 ). In , Anuwong introduced his successful transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA), which removes the thyroid gland through the oral vestibule without significant complications such as infection and mental nerve injury ( 13 ). Subsequently, TOETVA became the most famous endoscopic thyroidectomy method in the world ( 14 - 17 ).

Thyroid cancer has increased in incidence in the past three decades ( 1 ). Recent cancer statistics worldwide have indicated that the global incidence rate of thyroid cancer is 10.1 per 100,000 in women and 3.1 per 100,000 in men. It represents one in every 20 cancers diagnosed among women ( 2 ). The primary treatment for thyroid cancer is surgical removal of the thyroid gland with or without lymph node dissection. Conventional open thyroidectomy has been performed since approximately 100 years ago using a transverse skin incision on the anterior neck ( 3 ). This incision leaves a permanent noticeable scar on the anterior neck. While other cancers are common in older people, the prevalence of thyroid cancer is most frequent in individuals aged 30&#;50 years who are socially active, and the incidence is approximately three times higher in women ( 4 ). In some cases, hypertrophic scars or keloids appear on the scar. It leads to not only cosmetic problems but also psychological stress in patients, eventually decreasing their quality of life ( 5 ). For this reason, various thyroid surgery methods have been developed to avoid leaving a scar in the front of the neck.

Due to the lack of a previous study of energy devices in TOETVA, the sample size was calculated based on a previous study in open thyroid surgery. In a randomized study conducted by Sartori et al. in that compared ultrasonic shears and advanced bipolar device in open thyroidectomy, the ultrasonic group showed a significantly shorter operation time (94±24 vs. 129±32 minutes, P<0.05) ( 21 ). We set the alpha error as 0.05 and the 1 &#; β error as 0.95. Considering the dropout rate of 10&#;15%, the number of subjects required for recruitment was set up to 20 in each group (a total of 40 subjects) according to the sample size calculation using G*Power software version 3.1.9.2 (Bonn, Germany).

The primary endpoints were operation time for lobectomy, number of camera cleanings, and estimated blood loss during surgery. The operation time for lobectomy was defined as the time from endoscopic camera to completion of thyroid lobectomy. The secondary endpoints were pain score by visual analogue scale (VAS), the amount of postoperative drainage, and laboratory findings including white blood cell (WBC) count and C-reactive protein (CRP) on the first and second postoperative days. The drainage amount (mL/day) was measured from the cumulative Jackson-Pratt (JP) drain amount over 24 hours and checked at 7:00 am on the first and second postoperative days.

A single endocrine surgeon had performed all surgeries (Yi JW). The indications for TOETVA and the steps of the thyroidectomy procedure were described elsewhere in the report of a previous study ( 20 ). After trocar placement in the oral vestibule, the steps of the endoscopic period were as follows: subcutaneous flap creation by an energy device, mid-line strap muscle division, isthmus division, thyroid mobilization, superior pole dissection, recurrent laryngeal nerve and parathyroid identification, berry ligament dissection and lower pole dissection, with or without central lymph node dissection. A comparative view of important scenes during TOETVA according to ultrasonic shears and advanced bipolar device is shown in . According to random allocation, a single energy device was used during the surgery, ultrasonic shears or advanced bipolar device. Intraoperative neuromonitoring was used in all surgeries using the NIM-3 device (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA).

This study was designed as an open-label, prospective randomized controlled trial at a single university hospital. Patients who were scheduled for TOETVA were enrolled in this study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients aged between 20 and 70 years old, thyroid tumors without local invasion or distant metastasis on preoperative ultrasound, normal function of vocal cord on preoperative laryngoscopy or ultrasound, and no significant abnormalities in the preoperative laboratory tests. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in ). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Inha University Hospital (No. INHAUH -01-033) and informed consent was obtained from all individual participants.

The perioperative variables are described in . The operation time for lobectomy was significantly shorter in the advanced bipolar group (33.8±6.4 vs. 41.9±9.0 minutes, P=0.002). The number of camera cleanings was significantly lower in the advanced bipolar group (2.9±1.6 vs. 5.8±2.5 times, P<0.001). The estimated blood loss during surgery was significantly less in the advanced bipolar group (11.5±17.3 vs. 81.8±99.5 mL, P=0.004). Postoperative hospital stay days, amount of postoperative drainage, and visual analogue pain scale were not significantly different between the two groups. No significant difference was observed in the laboratory findings and postoperative complications.

Discussion

TOETVA is the most recently developed minimally invasive technique in thyroid surgery that does not require a skin incision. The concept of transoral approach thyroidectomy was initially proposed by Wilhelm et al. in using one sublingual incision and bilateral vestibular incisions of the mouth (22). However, there were many complications, such as mental nerve injury and infection. Endoscopic thyroidectomy using a vestibular approach was proposed by Wang in and showed better surgical outcomes (23). However, after Anuwong announced a method called TOETVA in , it began to become popular all over the world (13,24,25). According to many studies and systematic reviews, TOETVA is a feasible and safe method for the treatment of patients with benign thyroid nodules and selected differential thyroid carcinomas (14,26-31).

The thyroid gland is one of the highly vascularized organs in the human body (32,33). Arteries and veins are directly connected to the carotid and subclavian arteries and subclavian or internal jugular veins. As such, careful hemostasis during thyroid surgery is very important because postoperative bleeding can cause life-threatening complications by airway compression (33). In open thyroid surgery, dissection and ligation of thyroid vessels can be easily achieved by hand-ties or surgical clips. However, in endoscopic thyroid surgery, hand tie is impossible, and applying clips is also difficult compared to open surgery. Therefore, proper use of energy devices is not only very important because one cannot perform it without using them to prevent bleeding in endoscopic surgery, especially in thyroidectomy.

Currently, there are two types of energy devices being used in endoscopic surgery: ultrasound-based coagulation and shear devices and advanced bipolar vessel sealing and cutting device. The ultrasonic device uses ultrasonic vibrations to cut and coagulate tissue, with the active blade of the scalpel vibrating at 55,000 Hz (34,35). The high frequency generates heat, denatures protein, and seals vessels with minimal lateral thermal spread. The ultrasonic device seals vessels up to 5 mm in diameter (19). Advanced bipolar device applies a precise amount of bipolar electrical energy and pressure to fuse collagen and elastin in blood vessels, sealing it permanently (36). Advanced bipolar device can seal vessels up to 7 mm in diameter (33). The ultrasonic devices have a not insulated active tip, enabling surgeons to perform delicate and precise tissue dissection. On the other hand, the advanced bipolar devices stand out for their insulated mandible, which ensures a safer surgical experience. Ultrasonic devices are characterized to produce more vapor during tissue ablation, while bipolar devices, in contrast, are associated with the generation of more smoke during tissue coagulation.

Previously, some case studies showed a significant reduction in operative times by using ultrasonic or advanced bipolar devices compared to the traditional clamp-and-tie techniques in conventional open thyroid surgeries (37-40). Nemeth et al. conducted an analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data in and found that in thyroidectomy, vessel sealant devices, such as ultrasonic and advanced bipolar devices, were associated with a lower risk of complications, including hypocalcemia, hematoma, and deep vein thrombosis. The study also suggested that these devices are a more effective method of hemostasis than traditional techniques (41). Several randomized control trials comparing ultrasonic and advanced bipolar devices in open thyroid surgery reported that there was no significant difference in operation time, length of hospital stay, postoperative wound drainage, or surgical complications (19,42-46). To date, none of the available energy devices have been found to be significantly superior to the others in terms of clinical outcome, and the choice of energy device remains a matter of surgeon&#;s preference in open thyroid surgery (47).

Despite many clinical studies in open thyroid surgery, there are no comparative studies or randomized controlled trials that address energy devices in TOETVA. Currently, this study is the first randomized clinical trial to evaluate which energy device, ultrasonic or advanced bipolar, is better in TOETVA. In our study, there was no difference in terms of patients&#; demographics, clinical characteristics, and pathologic findings as shown in , indicating that the randomization of patients was good. Our study showed that the advanced bipolar group had significantly better performance in operation time (33.8±6.4 vs. 41.9±9.0 minutes, P=0.002) and number of camera cleanings (2.9±1.6 vs. 5.8±2.5 times, P<0.001). The shorter operation time in the advanced bipolar group is probably because advanced bipolar device requires less camera cleaning during surgery. Due to the high frequency of the ultrasonic vibrations and the jaw temperature rising above 200 &#; in the ultrasonic device, vapor scatters to adjacent areas and makes the camera lens dirty (48). For this reason, the camera easily becomes blurred and requires more cleaning during surgery. However, the advanced bipolar device utilizes electrical energy between the two jaws, with each jaw fully sealed by the insulator, and only creates vapor between the jaws. For this reason, the number of times the camera is wiped is reduced, which is thought to shorten the operation time. Intraoperative bleeding was also less in the advanced bipolar group in our study (estimated blood loss, 11.5±17.3 vs. 81.8±99.5 mL, P=0.004, respectively). These results showed that the microvascular hemostasis performance is better with advanced bipolar device than with ultrasonic scalpel. It also suggested that the amount of exudate generated from tissue dissection during thyroid surgery was smaller in the advanced bipolar group. In open surgery, both groups may experience minimal blood loss and the difference may not be pronounced due to the possibility of achieving hemostasis through conventional techniques, in addition to the use of energy devices. However, in TOETVA, where achieving hemostasis through conventional techniques is not possible, the difference in blood loss between the two groups may be more pronounced. In TOETVA, meticulous hemostasis is more challenging compared to open surgery, as surgeons are required to perform traction with one hand while using energy devices for dissection with the other hand, potentially leading to increased bleeding. However, postoperative hospital stay days, amount of postoperative drainage, visual analogue pain scale, and surgical complications were not significantly different between the two groups. Thus, although ultrasonic and advanced bipolar devices exhibit differences in operating time and intraoperative blood loss, we showed that both instruments can be safely applied in TOETVA. Taken together, our results suggest that both surgical devices can be safely applied in TOETVA, but advanced bipolar device was the better device, as it exhibited a faster operation time and less blood loss than ultrasonic scalpel.

Our study is the first randomized controlled trial on energy device use in TOETVA. In our study, all surgeries were performed by a single experienced endocrine surgeon with near 3,000 cases of experience in thyroid surgery. Among these cases, approximately 1,000 were performed using the robotic bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) technique, and around 350 cases were conducted using TOETVA. Notably, the surgeon reported having 150 cases of TOETVA experience in and 500 cases of robotic BABA thyroid surgery experience in (31,49). It is worth mentioning that this surgeon typically employs both energy devices almost equally and has previously published a retrospective study comparing the two energy devices in robot BABA thyroid surgery in (50). So, the effect of the surgeon&#;s proficiency, surgeon&#;s preference, or familiarity could be ignored in comparisons, and we could focus on the surgical performance by the instruments. Therefore, we believe that our results can be used as a good reference for many surgeons to select energy equipment when performing TOETVA. The limitations of our study are as follows. In studies on the use of specific devices in surgery, achieving double blinding is impossible. Therefore, since the operator knows which surgical instrument to use, the bias may act accordingly. In addition, since the study was limited to a single institution by an experienced surgeon, results from other institutions and novice surgeons are needed to make our results more generalizable. Although the results were well obtained with a relatively small sample size, there is a need to enroll a larger number of patients through multicenter studies. By expanding the research to include a larger number of cases and multiple surgeons in future studies, we can better mitigate potential biases and ensure broader applicability of the study results. The inherent selection bias of TOETVA candidacy, influenced by surgeon experience and comfort, is also a limitation of this study. In future research, we will also include a discussion on the costs and learning curve of TOETVA.

Hybrid Bipolar and Ultrasonic Vessel Sealing and Dissection ...

What

Hybrid bipolar and ultrasonic vessel sealing and dissection devices combine advanced radiofrequency energy with ultrasonic mechanical vibration to seal and dissect blood vessels and other tissue structures. The advanced bipolar functionality is optimized for sealing while the ultrasonic functionality is optimized for rapid dissection.

Are you interested in learning more about ultrasonic surgical system? Contact us today to secure an expert consultation!

Why

These devices are often used in open, laparoscopic, and thoracoscopic surgical procedures for the following purposes and benefits:

  • To seal and dissect blood vessels and other tissue structures when surgically removing organs. Common procedures in which this is done include hysterectomies, colectomies, splenectomies, gastrectomies, pancreatectomies, nephrectomies, and thyroidectomies.

  • To dissect tissue. Common procedures in which this is done include adhesiolysis and endometriosis resection.

  • To coagulate and dissect tissue faster compared to tying sutures. Speed is a critical factor for reducing the amount of time the patient is under anesthesia and also reducing the cost of time in the operating room.

  • To coagulate and dissect tissue without leaving objects in the body such as staples or clips.

How

These multifunctional devices combine the technologies of bipolar vessel sealing and dissection devices and ultrasonic vessel sealing and dissection devices.

Hybrid bipolar and ultrasonic vessel sealing and dissection typically involves the following main components:

  • Transducer: The transducer converts electrical energy from the generator into mechanical vibrational motion using the effect of piezoelectricity.

  • Waveguide: The waveguide transmits and amplifies mechanical motion from the transducer to the blade. The waveguide also conducts radiofrequency energy.

  • Blade: The blade is the exposed portion of the waveguide that generates frictional heating of tissue to induce ultrasonic coagulation and cutting. The blade also delivers radiofrequency energy to the tissue as one pole of the bipolar system for sealing.

  • Jaw: The jaw compresses tissue against the blade. The jaw also delivers radiofrequency energy to the tissue as the second pole of the bipolar system for sealing.

  • Tissue: The tissue is compressed between the blade and jaw. The bipolar energy and the ultrasonic motion of the blade cause the hydrated tissue to heat up. Collagen and elastin molecules within the tissue melt and then fuse back together, creating the seal. Continued application of ultrasonic blade motion dissects the tissue.

  • Lever: The user squeezes this to close the jaw.

  • Seal Button: The user presses this to activate advanced bipolar energy for sealing without cutting.

  • Seal and Cut Button: The user presses this to activate advanced bipolar and ultrasonic energy for simultaneous sealing and cutting.

  • Rotation Wheel: The user rotates this to rotate the shaft and jaw.

  • Generators: The advanced bipolar energy generator produces radiofrequency energy controlled by an algorithm for tissue sealing. The ultrasonic energy generator drives the transducer such that the system vibrates at its resonant frequency.

    If you are looking for more details, kindly visit surgical stapling.