Fair trade for surgical instruments - PMC

06 Aug.,2024

 

Fair trade for surgical instruments - PMC

lookmed Product Page

Short abstract

We may all be trying to buy fair trade coffee and bananas, but do we know where our surgical instruments are made, and under what conditions?

The global trade in medical commodities amounts to billions of pounds each year (www.standardsandpoors.com), with much trade between the developed and the developing world. The pricing and availability of pharmaceuticals, medical equipment, and biotechnologies, and the potential conflicts of interest and ethical issues, have all been questioned. Perhaps the most publicised case has been that of the provision of affordable medicines to combat the spread of HIV in the developing world,1 where international pressure resulted in drug companies cutting prices. Many other medical commodities (such as MRI scanners and endoscopic equipment) are too expensive for the developing world because costs of research and development are high.

Although many have argued the case for subsidising medical and pharmaceutical supplies to aid the developing world,2-4 the developed world may in some instances be compounding the problem through its own sourcing of medical supplies. Unlike the campaign for the fair trade of goods such as bananas, coffee, and sugar, there has been no such campaign for medical commodities. No systematic investigation has been undertaken into the sourcing of healthcare goods used in the developed world. When these have come from manufacturers in the developing world then, as is the case with other goods, the trade may be open to the exploitation of power by transnational companies, driving down prices and labour standards.

The scale of any such abuse is difficult to ascertain, because we usually do not know or ask where our healthcare products are manufactured or sourced. The trade in surgical instruments is open to unethical sourcing because many such instruments are manufactured in the developing world. This is rarely brought to the attention of end purchasers and consumers.

Trade in surgical instruments

The global trade in traditional hand held stainless steel surgical instruments is worth at least $650m (£352m, &#;507m) each year (excluding newer fibreoptic instruments or surgical implants).5 Most of these instruments are made by firms in towns in Europe and Asia&#;Tuttlingen (Germany), Sialkot (Pakistan), Penang (Malaysia), Debrecen (Hungary), and Warsaw (Poland). Of these, Tuttlingen and Sialkot are the largest areas of production. Each town has over 300 manufacturing firms compared with only a handful in the other areas.6

Companies in Tuttlingen are representative of the manufacture of surgical instruments in the developed world, which relies on specialist technology to produce endoscopes and implants in addition to more traditional instruments. Tuttlingen has an estimated workforce of and supplies two thirds of the world's surgical instruments, usually through direct trade to end users.6

Open in a separate window

Companies in Sialkot are representative of the manufacture of surgical instruments in the developing world, a practice that stems from the production of swords in the Punjab during the Mughal empire in the 17th century. Production methods are more traditional, with most instruments manufactured and finished by hand. Consequently, production is comparatively labour intensive, employing 50 000 people to supply one fifth of the world's surgical instruments.6

Manufacture and supply in Sialkot

Manufacturers of surgical instruments in Sialkot need to minimise costs to remain competitive. To reduce overheads, most firms subcontract the initial production of instruments to workers employed in a small workshop or their own home, with finishing and quality checking of the product in house.5,6 Before export, quality is checked against European Union or US standards. Manufacturing firms in Pakistan, however, rarely have the infrastructure or marketing presence to allow direct trade with the end users in the destination countries. Most therefore sell to suppliers and retailers in the developed world with only a small profit margin.6 These &#;middle men&#; (mostly in Tuttlingen) then trade with end users, predominantly in the US or Western Europe, usually after a considerable mark up. For example, a pair of fine surgical scissors will cost $1.00 to produce, will be exported from Pakistan to Germany at a price of $1.25 (personal communication), and will probably be sold to a hospital for nearer $80.00. In , instruments costing a total of $27.5 million were exported in this way from Sialkot.6

German suppliers have sourced instruments from Pakistan for some time. Historically, contractual relationships were developed whereby the German supply firms would use one Pakistani manufacturer.7 This achieved mutual benefit. For the Pakistani firm it guaranteed regular work and (arguably) a fairly negotiated price for its goods, whereas for the German supplier there was the security that the quality of instruments would be up to the standard stipulated by the contract. Whereas under this system there may still have been questions over the fairness or otherwise of prices that were paid to Pakistani firms, the situation was complicated by new US legislation in requiring surgical instruments that were imported to the US to comply to international quality standards (a requirement subsequently endorsed by the EU).7 Manufacturers complied with these standards to remain in business, but this created a shift in their relationship with suppliers in the developed world. Now that the suppliers knew that all surgical instruments would be manufactured to comply with international standards, they were free to award short term contracts based on the cheapest price without the need to stick with one manufacturer.8 This has driven down the profits of manufacturers in Pakistan and resulted in reductions in labour costs and safety standards. Furthermore, in such a competitive environment suppliers of instruments can stipulate unreasonable terms within their contracts. Instruments manufactured in Pakistan are regularly labelled &#;Made in Germany,&#; a practice that I have personally seen and that has been reported elsewhere.8,9 Refusal to comply with such requirements may mean loss of the contract to competitors, and so manufacturers feel they have no choice. Just how widespread such practice may be is difficult to ascertain, but it is certainly common.7

Labour conditions

The initial manufacture of surgical instruments involves die making, forging, filing, grinding, machining, electroplating, and heat treatment. Most of these processes are subcontracted to countless small process specific workshops, with the final finishing (chemical cleaning and polishing) and quality checking by the final producers.5,6 The use of subcontractors became common in the mid-s after a period of labour unrest and strikes.10 Subcontracting minimises company overheads and lowers costs, but, because subcontractors are not employees of the company and competition is fierce, it drives down wages and health and safety standards.5 Subcontracted manual labourers are paid per instrument,10 and the average worker earns around $2 a day (personal communication). They have no job security or guarantee of income and no medical insurance or provision of education for their children. Nearly all subcontractors are forced to seek wages in advance from the firms that employ them,7 further disadvantaging these workers' position in arguing for a fair wage.

Open in a separate window

Many subcontractors use child labour. Of the 50 000 labourers around are children,9 most starting work at the age of 9, and some as young as 7.11 For these children work is often a necessity; with large families and low wages the children in a family must work or the family risks starvation.12 Because of the subcontracted nature of the manufacturing process, there is little regulation of these employment practices (personal communication). These children are often from illiterate families, and they remain illiterate because of lack of education.

The manufacturing processes result in exposure to machinery used in forging, grinding, drilling, and milling; poor wiring; metal dust; noise; repetitive strain injuries; and toxic and corrosive chemicals including sulphuric acid, nitric acid, and trichloroethylene.11 In one study into the health of child labourers in the surgical instrument sector, 95% reported poor sleep, 50% reported injuries at work, and over 80% reported pain in the lower back, neck, and shoulders, as well as an increased incidence of conjunctivitis and bronchiolitis.11 Again the subcontracted nature of the work affords no protection to workers and no finance or incentive for the workers themselves to give occupational health a high priority.

Open in a separate window

Response to the problem

There has been some international and domestic response to the cause of the surgical instrument manufacturers in Pakistan, but most of this has centred on the issue of child labour. A programme between the International Labour Office (ILO) and the Surgical Instruments Manufacturers Association of Pakistan (SIMAP) is currently in its second phase. Its purpose is to monitor child labour in the sector and withdraw children from work to enrol them in funded education programmes.12 So far around children have been provided with education and reduced working hours, but few have been able to leave employment altogether.

Perhaps the more important issue is to look at the underlying cause of the problem&#;that of inadequate remuneration and labour standards. Purchasers of surgical instruments in Norway and the US have in the past refused to buy instruments unless they can be certified as not having been produced with child labour9,13; but such moves may reduce trade with the manufacturing regions, only compounding the underlying problems of poverty. The solution lies in purchasers insisting on fair and ethical trade when sourcing instruments. Pressure must be applied to suppliers in the developed world to be transparent about where their instruments have been manufactured and for them to ensure that the labourers have been paid a fair wage for their work and that basic international labour and health and safety standards have been followed, as defined by the International Labour Office.14 Again this must be done with due consideration; too heavy a hand may be to the detriment of trade in the region, which will impoverish these areas further. This pressure can come only from the purchasers of these instruments; in a financially competitive sector it is only the potential loss of income that can effect realistic policy change.

Increasingly people in the developed world consider ethical issues when they purchase groceries, clothing, and various other products. Yet we know relatively little of where and under what conditions medical commodities like surgical instruments are manufactured. The UK government has declared itself a key proponent of the EU framework for corporate social responsibility,15 and within this context the NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency has developed a sustainable development policy.16 The stated aims of this policy include encouraging NHS suppliers to ensure compliance with international labour standards and to act in an ethical business manner. Yet at present the health service is not meeting such obligations; there is no systematic assessment of the origin of the products it uses or the conditions under which they were produced. It is time to insist on fair and ethical trade.

Summary points

Many surgical instruments are manufactured in the developing world, particularly Sialkot in Pakistan

Labourers involved in manufacture earn poor wages, have poor health and safety standards, and include child workers

Suppliers of surgical instruments in the developed world may abuse their position to drive down prices in the developing world and stipulate unreasonable contractual obligations

There is a need for fair and ethical trade in the manufacture of medical commodities, and for the end users of these commodities to press for these changes

Notes

This article was posted on bmj.com on 28 July : http://bmj.com/cgi/doi/10./bmj...55

Contributor and sources: MB has an interest in global health and medical ethics and has ancestral roots in Sialkot, Pakistan. He visited the region in summer and was invited to see the areas where surgical instruments are manufactured. He subsequently undertook both literature based and interview based research into this topic (much of his information was from personal communication with workers in Pakistan, who wish to remain anonymous). He has chaired a workshop at the Medsin Global Health Conference investigating the ethics of global trade in medical commodities.

Funding: None.

Competing interests: None declared.

References

BMJ

;

320

: . PMC free article]PubMed] Google Scholar]

Yamey G. Drug companies cut HIV drug prices in the developing world.;: .

1.

Lancet

;

360

: -5. [Google Scholar]

Henry D, Lexchin L. The pharmaceuticals industry as a medicines provider.;: -5. [ PubMed

2.

Bioethics

;

19

: 460-75. [Google Scholar]

Dwyer J. Global health and justice.;: 460-75. [ PubMed

3.

Artif Organs

;

22

: 263-8. [Google Scholar]

Sass HM. Ethics of the allocation of highly advanced medical technologies.;: 263-8. [ PubMed

4.

5.

Nadvi K.

The cutting edge: collective efficiency and international competitiveness in Pakistan

If you want to learn more, please visit our website Surgical Instruments Wholesale.

. Oxford: Oxford Development Studies, :

27

(1).

6.

Nadvi K, Halder G.

Local clusters in global value chains: exploring dynamic linkages between Germany and Pakistan

. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, . (Working Paper 152).

World Dev

;

27

: -26. Google Scholar]

Nadvi K. Collective efficiency and collective failure: the response of the Sialkot surgical instrument cluster to global quality pressures.;: -26.

7.

Int Nurs Rev

;

46

: 112-6. [Google Scholar]

Germanotta P. The manufacture of surgical instruments: what nurses can do about child labour.;: 112-6. [ PubMed

8.

9.

Children at work: a handbook on child labour for public service workers

. Ferney-Voltaire, France: Public Services International, .

10.

Ghani JA.

Sailkot's entrepreneurial spirit

. Lahore: Centre for Management and Economic Research, . (Working Paper 96-10).

11.

Occupational health and safety problems faced by child workers in surgical instruments manufacturing sector. In:

Annual report of activities

. Lahore: Centre for Improvement of Working Conditions and Environment and Industrial Relations Institute, : 33-36.

12.

International programme on the elimination of child labour

. Geneva: International Labour Organisation, .

American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. International campaign targets US companies for importing surgical instruments made by Pakistani children. AFCSME News www.afscme.org/press//pr.htm (accessed 9 July ).

13.

14.

ILO declaration on fundamental principles and rights at work

. Geneva: International Labour Organisation, .

15.

One future&#;different paths: the UK's framework for sustainable development

. London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, .

16.

Sustainable development policy

. London: NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency, .

Sell Your Surgical Instruments to Alpha Biomedical

  • Sell Your Surgical Instruments

Sell Your Surgical Instruments

Sell Your Surgical Instruments

We purchase new and used surgical instruments!  

Instruments as a whole, are hard to sell and difficult to deal with. Some instruments are very valuable and desirable while some are not worth their weight in steel. So, how do you know what they're worth?

We have an easy process for determining the value of your instruments and we're happy to share the retail value and wholesale value of your instruments, so you can make an informed decision before selling them.

If you decide to sell them to us, we will make all logistical and shipping arrangements so you don't have to worry about how to handle this.

*Please note that we only purchase name brand, German grade instruments. We do not buy Pakistani or floor grade instruments.

Please send us an with the information listed below and we'll be happy to give you an offer.

Information To Include When Emailing Information About Your Instruments

  1. Manufacturer name or names. (For Example: Aesculap, Codman, Miltex, Jarit, Storz, etc)

  2. Estimated quantity.

  3. Please include some photos to give us an idea of what you have available.

    The company is the world’s best Surgical Products Wholesale supplier. We are your one-stop shop for all needs. Our staff are highly-specialized and will help you find the product you need.