Ophthalmic imaging has advanced tremendously over the past decade. There are now a wide variety of retinal imaging techniques to choose from. Given that each imaging modality has different machines with differing capabilities, it is important to review the preferred imaging modalities for each disease. In this article, we focus on the most useful imaging modalities for the most common retinal vascular disorders.
You can find more information on our web, so please take a look.
Fundus photography is useful for documenting the severity of retinopathy and can serve as a tool to help patients gain an understanding of their disease. The gold standard photography for the detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR) is stereoscopic color fundus photography in 7-standard fields (30°), as defined by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study group (Figure 1).2 However, this can take 10 to 15 minutes to complete and requires a skilled operator.
Figure 1. 7-standard field montage fundus photograph demonstrating proliferative diabetic retinopathy.Newer fundus cameras can capture between 30° and 55° fields of the retina in a single image. Stereoscopic fundus photography allows for examination of pathology in three dimensions, but a recent study found no difference in the ability of a trained ophthalmologist in interpreting monoscopic or stereoscopic photos.3
Ultra-widefield imaging can image up to 200° of the retina in a single image. The presence and increasing extent of peripheral diabetic changes have been shown to be associated with increased risk of DR progression over four years, suggesting the importance of obtaining widefield images.4 However, widefield imaging has limitations, including false color representation, eyelash artifact and high equipment costs in the range of $120,000 to $150,000. Newer systems (such as the Zeiss Clarus 500) generate images that provide true color and high resolution across an entire ultra-widefield image more closely resembling the fundus as seen during clinical exam.
An advantage of non-mydriatic fundus photography is that nurses or medical assistants can perform it, especially in a primary-care setting. It is often used as a screening tool in telemedicine programs. However, non-mydriatic photos are limited by the small field of view and decreased image quality.5
FA is the gold standard for visualizing retinal vasculature in vivo. It enables the identification of microaneurysms, macular edema and neovascularization. It can also be used to monitor the size of the foveal avascular zone. FA guides therapy by identifying the source of fluorescein leakage for possible focal laser treatment and monitoring response to panretinal photocoagulation. FA is most helpful to evaluate the extent and severity of retinopathy, particularly the degree of peripheral ischemia via standard FA and, most recently, via ultra-widefield FA (UWFA) (Figure 2). UWFA can detect predominantly peripheral lesions not visible on standard FA that are associated with an increased risk of DR.4 UWFA allows for identification of peripheral neovascularization and peripheral retinal ischemia, thus identifying patients who would benefit from panretinal laser photocoagulation and/or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy or patients at increased risk of neovascularization/vitreous hemorrhage who would benefit from more frequent follow up.6 However, widespread use of UWFA is limited by the cost of the technology.
Figure 2. Ultra-widefield fluorescein angiogram (Optos) showing active neovascularization in a patient with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.Spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) provides high- resolution, cross-sectional imaging of the retina with fast acquisition speed. It is most utilized for the initial detection and subsequent management of diabetic macular edema (DME). OCT allows for both quantitative and qualitative monitoring of retinal thickness and determination of edema location, either center involving or non-center involving that has led to an OCT-based reclassification of DME. OCT can also be used to identify subretinal fluid accumulation, presence of concomitant epiretinal membranes, vitreomacular traction or tractional retinal detachments. Additionally, it can provide information regarding the integrity of the photoreceptor layer, which can aid in visual prognostication.7
OCT angiography (OCTA) is a novel, non-invasive imaging technique that allows detection of retinal blood flow. Split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography detects the movement of erythrocytes through blood vessels and filters out noise, producing an accurate map of blood flow.8 Various studies looking at the utility of OCTA in DR have shown it to be effective in detecting microaneurysms and areas of neovascularization,9 and areas of absent or sparse capillaries can correlate with ischemia.10
Limitations of OCTA include the inability to visualize leakage from blood vessels and the limitation in size of the area imaged. Larger prospective studies are needed to further elucidate the role of OCTA in monitoring DR.
In my practice, traditional fundus photography remains the standard method of documenting and staging of DR at baseline. FA serves as the gold standard for baseline evaluation and subsequent monitoring for neovascularization in DR patients. OCT is the standard of reference for evaluating DME initially and in follow-up.
Fundus photography remains a standard imaging technique for documenting various AMD characteristics, such as drusen, pigmentary changes, atrophy, neovascularization and fibrosis. It has been used to evaluate geographic atrophy (GA) and monitor progression; however, there are limitations in its ability to precisely define lesion boundaries. Fundus photography should be combined with other imaging modalities when available.11
FAF relies on the visualization of lipofuscin pigment in the RPE, which increases with aging and various retinal diseases. It allows for identification of high-risk characteristics such as focal hyperpigmentation, which presents as increased signal intensity or hyperfluorescence. It also highlights areas of hypopigmentation, with decreased signal intensity or hypofluorescence correlating with RPE loss (Figure 3, page 19). By allowing direct visualization of GA, FAF is most beneficial for the initial assessment and monitoring of patients with GA specifically perilesional hyperfluorescence, which often precedes further retinal atrophy.12,13
Figure 3. Fundus autofluorescence showing areas of macular and peripapillary RPE loss in a patient with AMD.OCT enables monitoring of drusen characteristics and subtle changes that may precede progression and conversion to both GA and exudative macular degeneration.
It allows clear identification of the presence of intraretinal cystoid changes and subretinal fluid indicative of choroidal neovascularization (Figures 4, 5). Additionally, the response to anti-VEGF injections can be evaluated, which is critical to guide further therapy. Pigment epithelial detachment analysis can identify large detachments that are at risk for developing an RPE tear after initial anti-VEGF treatment. Furthermore, OCT analysis of photoreceptor integrity can help assess visual potential in late stages and determine whether continuation of therapy is indicated.
Figure 4. SD-OCT showing irregularity of outer retinal/photoreceptor layer and elevation of RPE with trace intraretinal fluid. Figure 5. OCTA showing type 1 neovascularization in AMD with medusa pattern.Given its ability to provide detailed evaluation of the neurosensory retina and RPE-Bruchs membrane complex, OCT remains a preferred imaging tool for screening, diagnosis, long-term monitoring and therapeutic efficacy assessment of AMD.13,14
OCTA is effective in the detection of choroidal neovascular membranes (CNVMs). Also, it helps to distinguish type 1 and type 2 CNVMs based on their presence below or above the RPE, respectively, as well as identify type 3 CNVMs, or retinal angiomatous proliferation lesions.15-18 It has been used to characterize two types of occult neovascular complexes: medusa vs. seafan (Figure 5).16 OCTA can also detect subclinical neovascularization corresponding to indocyanine green (ICG) angiography plaques, providing an indication for closer monitoring and the potential for intervention before significant disturbance of anatomical structure occurs.19 Moreover, it can distinguish subtle choriocapillaris alterations, which may have a future role in monitoring and predicting progression of nonexudative AMD.20 The clinical utility of OCTA in AMD is evolving. OCTA appears to have an expanding role in the diagnosis and follow-up for AMD patients.
FA remains the gold standard for detection and classification of neovascularization. CNV is detected by angiographic leakage, which poses a major limitation as progressive leakage of dye can obscure lesion boundaries.21 FA is an invasive and time-consuming procedure that carries risk of nausea, vomiting and, in extreme cases, anaphylaxis. For these reasons, it is not a recommended screening tool in asymptomatic patients. In comparison, OCTA provides noninvasive visualization of retinochoroidal vasculature that can be repeated and combined with FA for CNV detection and monitoring. OCTA can be considered for utilization as a screening device for early neovascularization.16
ICG angiography is a water-soluble dye that is almost completely protein bound after intravenous injection and is thus ideal for imaging the choroidal circulation. ICG can highlight occult CNV and pigment epithelial detachments. Choroidal neovascularization can appear as a plaque, a hot spot or a combination of both on ICG. Additionally, ICG is integral for diagnosing idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy and central serous chorioretinopathy, which at times may be considered in the differential diagnosis of AMD. In my clinic, FA remains the gold standard for the confirmation and characterization of exudative AMD, although there is and expanding role for OCTA. OCT, however, is most sensitive in monitoring disease activity and assessing response to anti-VEGF treatment.
For more information, please visit weiqing.
Fundus photography is useful for baseline documentation of clinical findings. Wide-field fundus photography can document the extent of retinal pathology observed, including intraretinal hemorrhages, dilated retinal veins, hard exudates and cotton-wool spots (Figure 6).
Figure 6. Color fundus photo showing multiple dot-blot hemorrhages in a patient with a central retinal vein occlusion in the right eye.FA can aid in diagnosis of RVO by showing an increase in retinal transit times. Additionally, FA is used to define the extent of capillary drop-out and macular ischemia, aiding in differentiation between ischemic and nonischemic central RVO (CRVO) (Figure 7, page 22). UWFA can show peripheral nonperfusion that is associated with increased risk of macular edema and neovascularization and may prompt closer follow-up.22 Also, FA shows cystoid macular edema as petaloid hyperfluorescence in the macula. Additionally, FA is useful to detect neovascularization of the disc and elsewhere in patients with CRVO and branch RVO (BRVO).
Figure 7. Fluorescein angiogram in 7 standard fields showing significant nonperfusion in a patient with central retinal vein occlusion.FA, therefore, is most useful to obtain upon presentation in patients with RVO to quantify the area of retinal and choroidal nonperfusion as well as during follow-up if there is high suspicion of neovascularization or if the patient has unexplained decreased vision.
OCT is primarily used to diagnose and monitor macular edema in BRVO and CRVO (Figure 8, page 22). SD-OCT provides the best spatial resolution, with data on the location of the accumulated fluid. Visual acuity in vein occlusion is also closely associated with the integrity of the foveal photoreceptor layer, which is best visualized on OCT.23 SD-OCT should be obtained upon initial diagnosis and subsequently to follow patients undergoing treatment for macular edema.
Figure 8. SD-OCT showing macular edema in a patient with central retinal vein occlusion.OCTA detects areas of hypoperfusion and nonperfusion of all retinal layers with excellent accuracy and can resolve the deep capillary plexus and the peripapillary radial capillaries.24 Also, OCTA can detect neovascularization of the disc and neovascularization elsewhere.8 However, given the small field of view, patients still require widefield FA to assess for peripheral neovascularization and non-perfusion. The utility of OCTA in RVO requires further study.
With so many imaging techniques at our disposal, it can be overwhelming to determine which modality is best suited to a particular retinal disease.
We hope this article is valuable to the clinician in navigating the variety of imaging modalities that can provide the most relevant information in the most efficient and cost-effective manner. OM
Tara Schaab, MD, is a medical retina fellow at the Department of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, Ill.
Sneha Padidam, MD, is a third-year resident at Kresge Eye Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine in Detroit, Mich.
Manjot K. Gill, MD, an associate professor of ophthalmology and director of Vitreoretinal Fellowships at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, specializes in the medical and surgical diseases of the retina and vitreous. Dr. Gill reports no relevant disclosures.
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php ).
We found no significant correlation between refraction and VA while using LEW in linear regression (r=0.17). Still, younger participants performed better in terms of VA with the device compared to older participants despite no differences in BCVA (p<0.01). The achievable VA with LEW was in general reduced compared to uncorrected VA (0.50 vs 0.40 logMAR). Only myopic subjects reached a significantly higher VA using LEW (p<0.001). Presbyopic subjects showed enhanced near VA (0.25 logMAR) by reading at 15cm with LEW without any further necessary refractive correction. Nearly all patients (80%) showed stereopsis without need for additional adjustments.
We conducted this trial to investigate a new wearable laser-eyewear (LEW). Images of an integrated camera are projected to the retina by a RGB-Laser (<1µW) and MEMS-mirror system. This enables a full-color live video as augmented reality embedded in the field of vision of the wearer. Thin parallel laser beams are projected following the principle of Maxwellian view through the center of the ocular lens to ensure independency of refractive errors. We performed a study with healthy subjects to test this independency.
Visual impairment (VI) is considered as a difficult condition worldwide both for the affected person and for the adequate care regarding therapy and adjustment of the best low vision aid (LVA) for the affected person. Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma are in the majority of cases the reason for VI and blindness in developed countries.1 Other diseases affecting the anterior segment of the eye can also leading to blindness. These includes VI due to corneal diseases, e.g., keratokonus, corneal dystrophies, opacities caused by chemical or thermal burns and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). While the most patients receive effectively treatment with surgery, like keratoplasty or limbal-stem-cell transplantation, some patients cannot undergo surgery due to ocular risk factors (e.g., uveitis, uncontrolled IOP, vascularization, etc.)2,3 or due to other comorbidities or even rejection of surgery. Often, there are long waiting periods of months or years for patients who could benefit from surgery because a suitable graft is necessary for them.4 These patient cohorts have to sustain from VI and from its implications regarding social miscommunication, reading disability, problems in recognizing faces and in accomplishing activities of daily living. Higher prevalence of depression, decrease of self-sufficiency and a loss of quality of life are the consequences of the above mentioned problems of patients suffering from VI.57 Therefore, it is important to support the patient´s visual rehabilitation and subsequently to increase their autonomy. Reading ability can be successfully improved by LVAs, e.g., electronic video (CCTV) or optical magnifiers.8 For most of visually impaired patients, magnification is currently the only option to improve their vision. However, patients with impairment of the optic media and preserved sensory function could enhance their vision by bypassing the diseased anterior part of the eye.3
A new type of retinal imaging LEW might be able to deliver such a bypass: The new technique allows projecting images directly onto the retina and improving thereby the VA of patients. Firstly, this was tried using a technique similar to the Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope (SLO), which was used to project Landolt C´s onto the retina in .9 Later Furness et al investigated the possibility of a direct retinal projection by means of a low-energy laser for LVAs.10 By using a laser, sharp images could be projected onto the retina, independent of the patient´s refractive errors and focusing ability.11 This could be achieved by the principle of Maxwellian view, in which the thin parallel laser beam projects images through the center of the ocular lens directly onto the retina.12 This laser projection technique allowed also passing through corneal opacities. The image was projected in a raster pattern, pixel by pixel onto the retina by means of a red laser diode and a mechanical resonance scanner (MRS).13 As a result of advances in recent years, technology has been further developed to project full color images of a camera, integrated into a spectacle, directly onto the retina.12,14,15 For this Retinal Imaging Laser Eye Wear (RILEW), a RGB (Red, Green and Blue)-Laser was used instead of the red laser diode by Furness et al, and the MRS-mirror was replaced by a microelectromechanical (MEMS) system, which allows even higher scan speeds (about 20ns) and thus higher-resolution (see ). Due to an autofocus and automated contrast settings the device can be operated in various circumstances and lighting conditions. The projection eyewear offers the unique opportunity to improve the VA by direct retinal projection in patients with corneal diseases. The wearer sees a full-color video, in real time, monocular as an augmented reality (AR) embed in his central field of vision, which still allows for peripheral vision opposed to virtual reality (VR) systems. Full color is realized by using a Red (640µm wavelength), Green (515µm) and Blue (465µm) laser diode.12
To be used as a LVA a laser eyewear system must satisfy two conditions: First, it is of extreme importance that the device inflicts no harm to the eye. Secondly, it should still be able to project clear images to be useful as a LVA.
The laser used in our study device is classified as a Class-1-laser according the IEC-1. The low energy output could be shown to be lower compared to a fluorescent lamp and is therefore harmless to the eye.12,16 To evaluate the second condition, if the device is, despite the low energy output, still able to project clear images independent of refractive errors we performed this prospective, single-site, clinical trial in healthy subjects. Secondary objectives were to investigate if the wearer experiences double vision while using the LEW, if reading is possible and if magnification by approximation is feasible.
The company is the world’s best Laser Retinal Imaging supplier. We are your one-stop shop for all needs. Our staff are highly-specialized and will help you find the product you need.